Glenn Reynolds expands on his idea to reduce corruption by taxing it.

In short, I propose putting a 50% surtax -- or maybe it should be 75%, I'm open to discussion -- on the post-government earnings of government officials. So if you work at a cabinet level job and make $196,700 a year, and you leave for a job that pays a million a year, you'll pay 50% of the difference -- just over $400,000 -- to the Treasury right off the top. So as not to be greedy, we'll limit it to your first five years of post-government earnings; after that, you'll just pay whatever standard income tax applies.

This seems fair. After all, when it comes to your value as an ex-government official, it really is a case of "you didn't build that." Your value to a future employer comes from having held a taxpayer-funded position and from having wielded taxpayer-conferred power. Why shouldn't the taxpayers get a cut?

Sounds like a fine idea to me. While we're at it, maybe we should pay high-level government officials a lot more.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Surtax on Former Government Officials.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.mwilliams.info/mt5/tb-confess.cgi/8207

Comments

Supporters

Email blogmasterofnoneATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info

Support