James Surowiecki asks what does procrastination tell us about ourselves? Worth reading in its entirety, but here's my favorite part:

Viewed this way, procrastination starts to look less like a question of mere ignorance than like a complex mixture of weakness, ambition, and inner conflict. But some of the philosophers in “The Thief of Time” have a more radical explanation for the gap between what we want to do and what we end up doing: the person who makes plans and the person who fails to carry them out are not really the same person: they’re different parts of what the game theorist Thomas Schelling called “the divided self.” Schelling proposes that we think of ourselves not as unified selves but as different beings, jostling, contending, and bargaining for control. Ian McEwan evokes this state in his recent novel “Solar”: “At moments of important decision-making, the mind could be considered as a parliament, a debating chamber. Different factions contended, short- and long-term interests were entrenched in mutual loathing. Not only were motions tabled and opposed, certain proposals were aired in order to mask others. Sessions could be devious as well as stormy.” Similarly, Otto von Bismarck said, “Faust complained about having two souls in his breast, but I harbor a whole crowd of them and they quarrel. It is like being in a republic.” In that sense, the first step to dealing with procrastination isn’t admitting that you have a problem. It’s admitting that your “you”s have a problem.

If identity is a collection of competing selves, what does each of them represent? The easy answer is that one represents your short-term interests (having fun, putting off work, and so on), while another represents your long-term goals. But, if that’s the case, it’s not obvious how you’d ever get anything done: the short-term self, it seems, would always win out. The philosopher Don Ross offers a persuasive solution to the problem. For Ross, the various parts of the self are all present at once, constantly competing and bargaining with one another—one that wants to work, one that wants to watch television, and so on. The key, for Ross, is that although the television-watching self is interested only in watching TV, it’s interested in watching TV not just now but also in the future. This means that it can be bargained with: working now will let you watch more television down the road. Procrastination, in this reading, is the result of a bargaining process gone wrong.

I've viewed my own decision-making process in this light for a long time. I frequently make bargains with my inner selves, and I later feel a strong obligation to fulfill those bargains. I still procrastinate, of course. For example, I've tracked fallen leaves into the house over the past week that need to be vacuumed up... eventually. There's no really hurry, especially since I know I'll just track in more leaves as Autumn progresses. Last night I agreed to let myself watch a Buffy marathon instead of vacuuming on the condition that I'd vacuum tonight. And I intend to do it!

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: On Procrastination.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.mwilliams.info/mt5/tb-confess.cgi/7574



Email blogmasterofnoneATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info