Paul Hsieh, cofounder of Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine, has written another excellent op-ed explaining how "universal healthcare" is antithetical to American liberty.
Imagine a country where the government regularly checks the waistlines of citizens over age 40. Anyone deemed too fat would be required to undergo diet counseling. Those who fail to lose sufficient weight could face further "reeducation" and their communities subject to stiff fines.
Is this some nightmarish dystopia?
No, this is contemporary Japan.
The Japanese government argues that it must regulate citizens' lifestyles because it is paying their health costs. This highlights one of the greatly underappreciated dangers of "universal healthcare." Any government that attempts to guarantee healthcare must also control its costs. The inevitable next step will be to seek to control citizens' health and their behavior. Hence, Americans should beware that if we adopt universal healthcare, we also risk creating a "nanny state on steroids" antithetical to core American principles.
Read the rest. "Universal healthcare" is incompatible with liberty -- and it's an unattainable myth anyway. Just ask any of my Canadian friends who have waited four months for an MRI.