Boeing loses the Air Force tanker program to a European consortium and Northrop Grumman. Wow, this is huge, and not good news for Boeing who was widely expected to win. Our future mid-air refueling tankers will be built by a foreign company an ocean away.

Boeing will protest the decision and probably lose. Here's the local take on the news.

The loss is a blow for Boeing's St. Louis-based defense unit, which was widely favored to win the contract by analysts and industry insiders and has a long history of building tankers.

But the EADS/Northrop proposal was deemed superior on four out of five criteria, according to Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute who's noted for his close ties to the Pentagon.

Basically, Thompson said, he was told the Northrop/EADS KC-30 won because it could carry more fuel and cargo. ...

Analysts say the loser is likely to file a protest with the Government Accountability Office, an increasingly common third act in major defense contracts. Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire has said she'd push for a formal inquiry if Boeing does not win.

Top Air Force officials and some in Congress have been hoping to avoid a protest, which could drag the acquisition process out by another two years. That would mean another two years of flying old and expensive-to-maintain KC-135s.

“Gosh, I hope there is not a protest,” Air Force chief of staff T. Michael Mosely told reporters Thursday, according to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. “I would ask (the losing bidder) to think about the country and think about the people that are flying the airplanes.”

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Boeing Loses Tanker Program.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.mwilliams.info/mt5/tb-confess.cgi/4822

2 Comments

Bernardo said:

Well, actually, they will probably be built in Mobile, Alabama...

And while I naturally wish the "KC-767" had won, you have to admit that if the "KC-330" is a more capable and/or cost-efficient airplane, then it should win. Especially if this causes a whole new factory's worth of jobs to be created. (And it's not like the folks at Everett are having a hard time finding enough work to do!)

BM: Maybe I've heard wrong, but won't most of the pieces be built overseas, with only final assembly in Mobile?

As for the actual merits of the two proposals, I'm not qualified to judge. I'm reacting more out of emotion and intuition that there could be some intangible advantages to having our tankers built by a purely American company.

Leave a comment

The comment login system is acting strange. If you get an error message saying you aren't logged in when you are, just reload the comment page and try again. I'm trying to track this bug down, but it's not easy.

Supporters

Email plasticATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info

Support