My brother sent me this utterly fascinating article that claims that overpraising kids' intelligence can lead to under-performance.
Dweck sent four female research assistants into New York fifth-grade classrooms. The researchers would take a single child out of the classroom for a nonverbal IQ test consisting of a series of puzzlesâ€”puzzles easy enough that all the children would do fairly well. Once the child finished the test, the researchers told each student his score, then gave him a single line of praise. Randomly divided into groups, some were praised for their intelligence. They were told, â€œYou must be smart at this.â€ Other students were praised for their effort: â€œYou must have worked really hard.â€
Why just a single line of praise? â€œWe wanted to see how sensitive children were,â€ Dweck explained. â€œWe had a hunch that one line might be enough to see an effect.â€
Then the students were given a choice of test for the second round. One choice was a test that would be more difficult than the first, but the researchers told the kids that theyâ€™d learn a lot from attempting the puzzles. The other choice, Dweckâ€™s team explained, was an easy test, just like the first. Of those praised for their effort, 90 percent chose the harder set of puzzles. Of those praised for their intelligence, a majority chose the easy test. The â€œsmartâ€ kids took the cop-out.
Why did this happen? â€œWhen we praise children for their intelligence,â€ Dweck wrote in her study summary, â€œwe tell them that this is the name of the game: Look smart, donâ€™t risk making mistakes.â€ And thatâ€™s what the fifth-graders had done: Theyâ€™d chosen to look smart and avoid the risk of being embarrassed.
Read the whole thing, it gave me a whole new perspective. Hard work is more praiseworthy than latent intelligence, so it shouldn't be a surprise that kids respond better to praise directed in that way. It would be silly to praise a good basketball player for being tall.
The article goes on to completely debunk the self-esteem industry.
Dweck and Blackwellâ€™s work is part of a larger academic challenge to one of the self-esteem movementâ€™s key tenets: that praise, self-esteem, and performance rise and fall together. From 1970 to 2000, there were over 15,000 scholarly articles written on self-esteem and its relationship to everythingâ€”from sex to career advancement. But results were often contradictory or inconclusive. So in 2003 the Association for Psychological Science asked Dr. Roy Baumeister, then a leading proponent of self-esteem, to review this literature. His team concluded that self-esteem was polluted with flawed science. Only 200 of those 15,000 studies met their rigorous standards.
After reviewing those 200 studies, Baumeister concluded that having high self-esteem didnâ€™t improve grades or career achievement. It didnâ€™t even reduce alcohol usage. And it especially did not lower violence of any sort. (Highly aggressive, violent people happen to think very highly of themselves, debunking the theory that people are aggressive to make up for low self-esteem.) At the time, Baumeister was quoted as saying that his findings were â€œthe biggest disappointment of my career.â€
Now heâ€™s on Dweckâ€™s side of the argument, and his work is going in a similar direction: He will soon publish an article showing that for college students on the verge of failing in class, esteem-building praise causes their grades to sink further. Baumeister has come to believe the continued appeal of self-esteem is largely tied to parentsâ€™ pride in their childrenâ€™s achievements: Itâ€™s so strong that â€œwhen they praise their kids, itâ€™s not that far from praising themselves.â€