It's nice to see Senator Barbara Boxer concerned about protecting unborn babies.
And they [ed - the gang of 14] said they would only, they would only use the filibuster in extraordinary circumstances. Well, if ever there was an extraordinary circumstance, here it is, right now, before us. The swing vote on an issue that if it is wrongly decided could cause the death of our youngest women.
Of course she means something else, but what? Who knows.
Update:
Kevin Murphy has written a Democrat-speak translator that should come in handy during the upcoming Supreme Court nomination battle. He also wonders why we as a nation can't "move on" past the abortion issue to topics we agree about. Well, I for one will be happy to move on once the pro-abortionists stop murdering babies.
There we have it: proof positive that most anti-abortion absolutists, including you, don't really believe all their own rhetoric about murdering babies. If someone were out there actually murdering babies - healthy, born ones, that is - no one would be happy to "move on" if the cops declined to arrest and prosecute him, having instead merely persuaded him to stop.
Our least-favorite Senator has also been running off about "5,000 deaths a year" if Roe were overturned. This is an enormous exaggeration -- see our post "Barbara Boxer and the Big Lie" at Independent Sources.