Why are homosexuals at such higher risk of contracting HIV and AIDS than are sexually active heterosexuals? There are a two main reasons.

First, gays tend to have more sex partners than straights.

... the GSS data indicates that the median number of sexual partners since age 18 for heterosexual men is 6, and 10 for homosexual men. The averages, however, are 15 and 37, respectively. Now, it's true that the averages are a better way of figuring out what a majority is doing--but the median gives us a pretty good that the high end of the promiscuity curve for homosexuals could be pretty large. The median for homosexual men is 1.66 times that of heterosexual men; the average, however, is 2.46 times. This suggests that some significant minority of homosexual men have a lot of different sexual partners--although by itself, this doesn't tell us how large or how promiscuous this crowd is.

A small number of gay men have a huge number of sex partners, and these men act like HIV seeds that drop the virus into the community at many distant points. Picturing the gay community as a graph of nodes and vectors, the mean number of sexual partners is more important than the median for determining how quickly the virus will spread because the virus does not lose any power as it jumps from person to person.

A small number of straights have a huge number of sex partners also: they're called prostitutes. The difference between gay men and straight prostitutes brings us to the second reason straights have less of a risk of getting HIV: vaginal and oral sex are much less likely to spread the virus, particularly if the carrier is the woman. Some risk statistics:

Studies of HIV transmission have calculated the risks of infection. The studies came up with very different rates. For example, one study reported the risk for infection from one episode of unprotected receptive anal intercourse with an HIV-infected partner at 1 in 3,333. Another study said 1 in 50 episodes.

For regular partners who were active in anal sex, the risk for transmission was 1 in 10. The risk for the insertive partner (the "top") is believed to be about 10 times less than for the receptive partner (the "bottom").

The risk of HIV infection during vaginal intercourse is believed to be much less. One estimate was 1 in 200,000 for transmission from infected women to men and 1 in 100,000 for transmission from infected men to women.

Because it's hard for HIV to spread from women to men, the virus spreads much less quickly in the heterosexual community -- every second step in the infection chain is a woman. So, for instance, a man M1 who has sex once with a woman W1 who had sex once with a man M2 who has HIV will have a cumulative 1 in 20 billion chance of contracting HIV. A man M3 who has sex once with a man M4 who had sex once with a man M5 who has HIV will have a cumulative chance of contracting HIV between 1 in 11 million and 1 in 1.1 billion (depending on how they had sex).

So, as you can see, even if gays had the same number of sex partners as straights, HIV would spread approximately 200 times as quickly through the gay population. Since gays have around 2.5 times as many partners, HIV will spread approximately 500 times faster among homosexuals than among sexually active non-monogamous heterosexuals. ("Approximately" because it's not as simple as multiplying 200 by 2.5, but that's close enough.) Of course, people who are monogamous or not sexually active will not get HIV in this way; there are probably more chaste straights than gays, which further reduces the relative number of HIV infections per capita within the straight community.

It's good that many gays are waking up to these numbers in the wake of the recent so-called super HIV strain, but unless people are willing to reduce their participation in risky behaviors they won't make much progress. Fear is a powerful motivator, and if you can't take pleasure in doing right, you can at least be afraid of what will happen when you do wrong.

"You can't have a core group of people having sex with large numbers of people without amplifying any sexually transmitted disease that enters the system," said Gabriel Rotello, author of "Sexual Ecology: AIDS and the Destiny of Gay Men." "I don't have any doubt that a resurgent H.I.V. epidemic will hit the gay population in the near future," he said. ...

Until people really believe an unstoppable virus is out there, he said, they will continue to indulge in unsafe sexual practices. "People are not going to modify their sexual habits in ways that are difficult or unpleasant until they see their friends dying again," he said. "And to me that's just an unbelievably depressing thought."

Update:
David Orland asks why men and women in sub-Saharan Africa tend to have nearly equal infection rates, and links to tihs page about women and AIDS which says (not about Africans specifically):

This may already be happening - data from the CDC in America shows that among teens, girls accounted for more than half of new HIV infections reported in 2001. Globally, women make up 60% of the 15 – 24 year olds who are HIV+.

But note that in a heterosexual community, both genders will get infected at the same rate even though it's easier to spread the virus from male to female than from female to male. As long as people only have sex with those of the opposite gender, every second link in the infection chain will be a man, and every second link will be a woman. If there's a significant difference in the number of partners between men and women (median, this time) there may be a slightly different rate of infection for each gender, but ultimately an equilibrium rate will be established that will be the same for both genders.

Since many HIV infections in Africa are now spread from mother to child at birth, it's likely that the infection rate in Africa has reached an equilibrium with between one-third and one-half infected with the virus. That's an astonishing infection rate, and it probably represents nearly the entire sexually active population, plus lots of children.

2 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Risk and the Rate of Spreading HIV and AIDS.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.mwilliams.info/mt5/tb-confess.cgi/2855

» Further Mysteries of HIV Infection. from Res Ipsa Loquitur

... The real mystery, as far as I'm concerned, is this: if the biological impediments to serial heterosexual transmission of HIV/AIDS are as significant as they seem to be, why is it that (sub-Saharan) African men and women, in contrast to pretty muc... Read More

» Some AIDS Sanity Emerges from Flit(tm)

The gay community, after a quarter century, has finally started catching up with public health officials. While many are calling for a renewed commitment to prevention efforts and free condoms, some veterans of the war on AIDS are advocating an... Read More

10 Comments

Mark said:

Nothing you've mentioned is news to me. I've always been an advocate of safe sex.

Mark said:

.. and that's coming from a young gay man.

SillyDude said:

i've been trying to teach my dog safe sex, but he keeps licking the condom off.

do said:

The page to which I link does say something about Africans, in fact, just further down:

"Just under two-thirds of all people infected with HIV are living in Sub-Saharan Africa, 57% of whom are women. Around 76% of young people here who are infected with HIV are female."

On reflection, your point seems perfectly obvious. You write: "If there's a significant difference in the number of partners between men and women (median, this time) there may be a slightly different rate of infection for each gender, but ultimately an equilibrium rate will be established that will be the same for both genders."

Stupid, I suppose, but I had long imagined that it might have something to do with a cultural preference (undocumented, to my knowledge) for heterosexual anal intercourse as a contraceptive.

do said:

Anyhow, thanks. I've update my post.

Brad said:

Your statistic of "between one-third and one-half infected with the virus." was higher than I had ever seen before, and so I followed the link and still did not see anything that indicated a 33%-50% prevalence rate. As far as I'm aware, only the hardest hit nations exceed 30% (i.e. Swaziland and Botswana).

Aside from that nit-pickery, I agree that everyone, gay and straight, needs to be aware of the risks associated with HIV and AIDS, and needs to know how to protect themselves.

Mark: Good. Unfortunately, many people (gay men, in this case, in developed nations) see any calls for responsibility as "oppression".

do: I just meant that the part I quoted specifically wasn't about Africa. You may be right about anal sex there, I have no idea.

Brad: I've read lots of stories about how those estimates are often shown to be low. 50% may be too high, but I don't think 33% is too low. Remember also that most stats I've seen only count adults (15 - 49), but children are very likely to be infected as well. Possibly more likely, considering the poor health care available to HIV+ mothers. Anyway, it was just an estimate of my own, I'd be happy if the actual rate is lower.

One must be extremely skeptical of any statistics about AIDS that originate from an African source. There are strong financial incentives to over-report it: international monetary assistance for combatting AIDS, from both private and governmental donors, is usually tied to the number of cases reported.

Hank said:

While the AIDS problem in Africa is real the data collection system is not as good as in the developed countries.

AIDS itself does not kill, it destroys the immune system so some other disease kills.

If most places in Africa the HIV/AIDS rate is not determined by the primary means of conducting HIV tests. It is determined from the secondary data of how many people have diseases that kill people whose immune system is destroyed. However these diseases are endemic to Africa, people die of them with AIDS infection. The last time I looked at it a couple years ago there was no way to separate the natural cause of these diseases from the AIDS caused.

Craig said:

I think gay men need to get real, find a HIV- partner and stay faithful. You guys sleep around way too much! If you want to get married, well isn't marriage about monogamy? When AIDS first came around there was fear, now the fear is gone because of medication. You need that fear back in you. Fear isn't always bad. It keeps you on your toes!

Leave a comment

The comment login system is acting strange. If you get an error message saying you aren't logged in when you are, just reload the comment page and try again. I'm trying to track this bug down, but it's not easy.

Supporters

Email plasticATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info

Support