The Village Voice has a no-duh article about the burdens of being a woman -- as a man it's interesting to read, but as a rational human it's hard not to wonder why Anya Kamenetz writes as if she's pondering a profound conundrum.

If you're a woman between the ages of, say, 18 and 30, then chances are good you were raised by a mother who aspired to be an '80s superwoman, a CEO-domestic goddess in shoulder pads—and so, minus the shoulder pads, do you. Creative satisfaction, along with money, romance, and gorgeous offspring, is part of our deluxe have-it-all package. And yet, in the years between college and settling down, we run smack into some harsh economic realities that can leave us sounding like women on the verge of a nervous breakdown.

"Just make me sound not too insane," pleaded one woman who reluctantly agreed to talk about her situation.

"I'm in this really hard place and I honestly don't know what to do," said another.

And, "Is this making any sense at all?"

The cause for much of the confusion is that these women have been told that they can have their cake and eat it too, which is impossible for any of us to do. They don't seem to realize that although they have, as women, more biological options than men do, they don't have any additional time or energy to take advantage of every option at the same time.

On a limited budget of time and money, we have to somehow prioritize making a living, making our mark, and making a family. As hard as this economy is for young adults in general, it's that much more complicated for women, who not only earn less but want more. Both men and women of this generation are taking on unprecedented debt for their educations, but at 76 cents on the male dollar, women have a harder time working their way into financial stability. They're also more likely to take time out of the labor force, which slows the career climb and drags down earnings.

Differences in expectations and ambitions between men and women almost wholly account for the pay discrepancy, and taking time out of the work force to have as child is part of that. Why should a person, male or female, who takes a year or more away from a job expect to get paid the same as a person who doesn't? It wouldn't be fair, and it doesn't even make sense. A person has to decide whether time with the child is more important than a higher salary, and in families with two parents it's generally the woman who wants to stay home. Plus, it's convenient because she has boobs.

Lagusta Yearwood, 26, is a chef with her own gourmet-vegetarian meal delivery service, lagustasluscious.com. She has struggled to get the business up and running while paying off about $45,000 in debt from student loans and from living on credit cards while in college and culinary school. "I was an English and women's studies major [at the University of Rochester], and now I'm a cook," she says. "I'm happy I went to college, but if I'd known I would come out with so much debt and wouldn't be making money from my degree, I wouldn't have gone."

Yes well, many Americans are over-educated. We tend to worship education as the solution to every problem, but that doesn't always turn out to be the case.

Marriage has traditionally been the means for women to provide for themselves and their children. Of the dozens of women on the 2004 Forbes Richest People list, nearly all of them made their fortunes through marriage. But few twentysomething women today are counting on a breadwinner.

"I feel like girls are really brought up to imagine their lives with a partner," says Sara, 27, who is getting her MFA in creative writing at Columbia. "I can imagine myself in a long-term relationship but not in a way that has any impact on the way I think about my economic life."

This changing ambition among women is probably largely due to the failure of men to live up to our responsibilities. A woman would be crazy to become dependent on a man who can't provide for her and who may not stick around very long. Raising a family is, I imagine, hard, and modern men tend to be flighty and more concerned with comfort than with honor and integrity. Women I know who have found honest, hard-working men who really mean "till death do us part" are incredibly happy in their relationships and don't seem to have much trouble trusting and depending on their husbands.

Kemah, 24, approaches the question a little differently. She is majoring in film and theater at Hunter College and will be around $60,000 in debt by the time she graduates next year. She has resolved to have children whether or not she can find the right partner. "My thinking five years ago was that I have to get married to accomplish some of the things I want to do. Now that I'm getting older I think I can do it myself. I didn't grow up with my father and I don't want to depend on a man."

That's a perfect example of how one pathetic man hardened and disillusioned his daughter. As men, we must prove ourselves worthy to be trusted, otherwise it should be no surprise when we're not. Respect is earned through action.

Young women today were raised with clear messages of achievement and self-reliance. They often outnumbered men at their colleges and graduate programs, and are making economic sacrifices for the fulfillment of their own dreams, without waiting for anyone else's permission. They have taken their equality for granted. Yet as they now struggle to establish themselves, they're realizing, for the first time, the betrayals of gender.

Women are not betrayed by their biology; women have more options than men do but only the same amount of time, so they have to make more decsions and leave more roads untraveled. That's only a burden if you count success by what you haven't done rather than by what you have. If a woman's glass appears less than half-full, it's because she has a larger glass.

Dr. Fels says that as women's access to education at all levels has improved, their second-class citizenship often doesn't kick in until after graduation. "Right now the disadvantages are invisible. It's not as clear as being let into a school, but institutions that employ people still ignore families and children," she says. "It's an issue that women feel is their problem, their personal dilemma, but is really a major issue for the entire country." The good news is that we're not crazy; the bad news is that the system needs a major intervention.

And here we must part ways. As they say, the biology of women isn't a bug, it's a feature. Rather than longing to be just like men, why don't women revel in the opportunities they have, in the joys and sorrows that us men will never know? This writer blithely assumes that what men have is somehow better than what women have, but isn't that view itself a product of a male-centered world view?

(HT: Gawker.)

6 Comments

DeoDuce said:

The article is patronizing to feminists. Frankly, I found her style a bit whine-ish and victimized. Yes, some shortfallings of society may be to blame for some of the "new order" in regards to working women, but in the end, each woman is able to make her own decisions. If a woman isn't able to evaluate a situation and make an informed decision, then she has no room to complain.

The article mentions that the system needs intervention. It's basically a plea for help, in my opinion, and I agree with your statement that that is in itself a product of the worldview.

It is how it is, and we women have to accept that. We aren't going to outscore men in some areas because it's not the natural order of things. Men and women are made to excel at different things, and each should be happy with that. It isn't to say that women shouldn't be ambitious and independent, I think they should, but with wisdom and meticulous planning.

Ben Bateman said:

That article would be a parody if posted on a conservative web site. Women can't have everything they want? They must make hard choices? Women who major in English and women's studies can't make money from their degrees? Oh, the horror!

Next I suppose these young women will discover that pregnancy is debilitating, and childbirth is painful.

Cowboy said:

Michael –

Once again I find myself in agreement with Deo. Not only is the article somewhat patronizing in essence, I find it annoying that people, women or men, blame society for their problems instead of taking personal responsibility. My wife agreed with Deo's sentiment as well for another female perspective.

meep said:

I guess my upbringing is a bit different than many of my white, middle class cohorts of a certain age. My ma, a well-educated woman, stayed at home with us kids until I was 12, and then she worked only part-time. My father was the breadwinner, and we lost him only to death (my mother remarried later, and she's still married to my stepfather.) But had my dad lived, we all knew he'd never leave the family. He was the model breadwinner/dependable dad. I saw this as my model -- I remember what it was like to have a parent at home when I was young. The feeling of security was very important. But it's true my Dad did have to work long hours sometimes.

So now, we've started our own family. Of course, I'm the one who's going out to work -- I may be the woman, but I'm also the one with a college and graduate degrees in the very marketable field of applied math, and my husband had child-rearing experience that I didn't have. We decided on this division of labor when we got married.

Pregnancy isn't terribly debilitating - not at a reasonable age. And when my job is mainly sitting in front of a computer and doing programming, it's just as easy for me to do that while pregnant than when not.

Childbirth is definitely painful, and I'm not looking forward to that bit again. But it lasts only a few hours, and you quickly forget the pain when you've got a new baby in your arms.

But I do see that I am missing stuff, like my Dad did -- there are days where I leave before my daughter wakes up and get back after she goes to bed. That's life. You do what you can, and realize that one decision you make will close out other choices.

meep: Wow, thanks for sharing your experiences. As a man, I really don't want to work so much that I miss that sort of family stuff, but I know that's a luxury.

Wacky Hermit said:

I would beg to differ about pregnancy being debilitating. Every pregnancy is different, even those undertaken at a "reasonable age". For example, with my most recent pregnancy (my third, at age 30), I found myself practically bedridden for the last six weeks with false labor contractions and other indignities of pregnancy. With my second pregnancy, I taught college all the way up to the day I delivered, and returned one week later.

Pregnancy is a huge crapshoot. You cannot predict what kind of day you will have tomorrow, so if you have a job that does not let you set your own pace, you are totally hosed. I feel sorry for women who believe that being able to work non-stop during and after pregnancy is normal, because they are liable to be horribly disappointed.

Leave a comment

The comment login system is acting strange. If you get an error message saying you aren't logged in when you are, just reload the comment page and try again. I'm trying to track this bug down, but it's not easy.

Supporters

Email plasticATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info

Support