W

.. as if anyone doubted or questioned who you're voting for.

And I highly doubt that this advertising for Bush is going to result in any more votes for him. Those visitors to your site who aren't voting for Bush aren't going to be persuaded.. and those who are voting for him were either going to vote for him anyway or already have.

Mark: It's not advertising -- I'm just showing support!

You know Michael, I've come to the conclusion that you are just much too devisive. I propose that you abandon your convictions, and give equal time to all sides.

With that idea in mind, you should immediately update this post with the introduction of a Kerry Edwards photo. Of course, to be properly PC I suppose you should include a Nader pic.

Now repeat after me (with a smile, of course), "Acceptance, tolerance, affirmation!" Ah. Isn't that better?

Ed. Note: Mark, get over yourself, man.

JP: What are you talking about?

MW: If you want to talk about SUPPORT... my support goes to Badnarik (Libertarian). Since he has no chance of winning, my VOTE goes to Kerry.

It's not that Michael should show banners for other candidates... just that it's incredibly trite for Michael to post a Bush/Cheney banner. Anyone who doesn't know that Michael is a Bush supporter obviously doesn't know how to read.

.. just as how anyone who doesn't know that I'm predominantly Libertarian (yet voting for Kerry because Badnarik has no chance) doesn't know how to read either.

Michael, I love the fact that you advertise for Bush! FOUR MORE YEARS! All that hot air from Michael Moore and his menagerie of Hollywood supporters didn't do any good did it? Hee, Hee! FOUR MORE YEARS! GO BUSH!