Gun scholar John Lott suggests that the murder rate in Baghdad is lower than the murder rate in Washington DC. He explains why, and gives some convincing data to support his numbers and show that that numbers used by hysterical critics are vastly (and deliberately) inflated by up to 3000%.

This despite the fact that Iraqis can own machine guns, and are in the middle of a guerilla war.

Tim Lambert thinks Lott is full of it, but Mr. Lambert's analysis seems to leave a lot to be desired as well. For instance, he bases his numbers on the single month with the most gunshot deaths, rather than an average number. He also seems to think that every dead body ends up in the city morgue, which is nonsensical.

Anyway, in a city where residents routinely fire automatic weapons into the air to celebrate birthdays and soccer games, statistics about gunshot deaths alone won't get anyone very far in determining a murder rate.

2 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Baghdad's Murder Rate.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

» Baghdad’s Murder Rate Irresponsibly Distorted by Lott from John Lott's Unethical Conduct

Last time I commented on Lott’s claims about the Baghdad murder rate, I noted his pathological refusal to admit that he was wrong about the r...

Read More

» A retort to Lott from Say Uncle

Tim Lambert writes a critique of the John Lott article that I linked to here. It appears to me that Mr. Lambert is guilty of... Read More



Email blogmasterofnoneATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info