"Singles Seek Financial, Legal Perks Offered Marrieds" says this FoxNews article; it mentions a lot of the standard issues with cohabitating couples and same-sex couples &c., but none of those apply to me. What I'd like to comment on here is the fact that single people are essentially forced to subsidize the families of married people, which I think is economically unfair.

Singles get smaller capital gains breaks when they sell a house than married couples, and spouses don’t get taxed on inherited estates. Also, according to Coleman, married persons get paid more on average for the same job during the same length of service when spousal health benefits are factored in.

"We need to encourage employers to create single family workplaces, provide cafeteria-style benefits," he said. Under such a plan, health care money not used for a spouse or child "could go toward an elderly parent, or maybe [toward] putting a domestic partner on the plan."

Or better yet, just pay me cash for the healthcare costs of the wife and kids I don't have.
William Doherty, a professor of family social science at the University of Minnesota, said the complaints sound a bit foolish and selfish.

"The single person in the workplace is resenting the fact a parent gets time off to tend to a sick child. Give me a break," he said.

Yeah, that's right! Why should I give you a break? Are you saying it's fair that someone gets extra time off just because they have a kid? That's totally incidental to the workplace, and it's fundamentally unfair to people without children who'd also like a personal day.
But Doherty said not all relationships should be treated equally under the law.

Marriage is not a lifestyle choice, but a "public commodity," critical for the survival of the human race, he said, adding that it deserves special supports and incentives.

"If there is no next generation, we are gone, we are dead," he said.

If there's no next generation, I don't see how that affects me. It sucks for the non-existent next generation, I suppose, but why should I care? Anyway, it's absurd to think that people will stop having kids... and if they can't afford them, maybe that's a good reason not to have them.

People with kids get child tax credits, public education, and public healthcare, all at the expense of people without kids. People with kids are a greater drain on our common infrastructure, and kids are destructive and disruptive. If anything, people with kids should pay more taxes.

However, since I hope and expect to have kids of my own one day, my complaints are mostly hot air. I don't think the current system is fair, but since most voters have kids there's no way it's ever going to change. Eventually I'll have kids too, and then I won't want it to change either. Still, it's an obvious socially-motivated redistribution of wealth, which I'm generally against.

3 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Marriage Benefits.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.mwilliams.info/mt5/tb-confess.cgi/2604

» The Perks, Baby from Absinthe & Cookies (a little bit bitter, a little bit sweet)

Article on FOX News about singles and those married perks. Read if you are so inclined. It's a subject I Read More

» Oh!! The Nerve! from Absinthe & Cookies (a little bit bitter, a little bit sweet)

I'm going to pick on Francis now! Now, I love Francis, he's a wonderful commenter here on A&C, and a Read More

Mike Williams the blogger, NOT Mike Williams the USC wide receiver, reminds us that single people are subject to the same discrimination as gays and lesbians, when it comes to many government policies...is it doubly-worse if you are a single... Read More



Email blogmasterofnoneATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.

Site Info