Message of the Day:

Some friends and I have just launched MindThrow, a site designed to help you find new things to do based on your current interests. Check it out, and make sure to send any feedback you've got, positive or negative, to mindthrowATgmailDOTcom.

A New Comment Paradigm


Categories:

Oscar Jr. is onto something with his idea of "comment squatting". However, I'd like to expand on that; we need a whole new paradigm for comments!

As it is, the comment sections on blogs that have them act like a single thread on a message board. If there are a lot of commenters things can quickly get confusing and disorganized, or even degenerate into flame-wars. That's no good! In fact, most of the big-name bloggers refuse to allow comments on their sites for just this very reason.

What to do? My proposal is simple: replace the comment thread with an entire message board dedicated to that single post. Users could create threads on the board for different sub-topics, thereby preventing confusion. The blogger could even appoint administrators for the boards to help him keep things civil.

Most blogs would only need a single Master of Comments, since most of us don't get enough feedback to really have to worry about administration. As for the big boys, I have no doubt that Glenn, Steven, Eugene, and the rest could find dozens of suitable volunteers, with minimal extra effort on their own parts. Andrew already has something of the sort going; he's got an assistant to handle and publish comments that readers email to him.

What about clutter? you ask. Easy, I reply. Most blogs dump everything more than 7 days old off into the archives; when a post moves off the front page the associated forum could simply shut down, if desired. Lock it, delete it, or even migrate each individual thread into a large master-blog-forum where it can live or die on its own. The possibilities are endless.

Of course, in a sense, hundreds of little blogs already act as comment sections for the top dogs; why complicate matters? People like interactivity! Introducing a forum-based comment section would lower the cost-of-entry for would-be commenters, and potentially increase the utility of blogs to casual readers who would like to respond but don't want to take the time to set up a blog of their own.

I don't think the software yet exists to manage forums in the way I've described, but that's a mere technicality; there's great forum code out there that can be adapted easily enough. As blogs become journalism the Crowd will want to get more involved, and most of the major blogs are, in a way, less interactive than print publications that run letters to the editor. This new vision for comments -- or something like it -- is essential for the next stage of our blog-olution.

Update:
I wrote a response to Bill's post earlier this week on another hurdle that blogs must overcome before they supplant journalism: they've got to make money. Without revenue, blogs will continue to churn out quality punditry, but little true reporting.

6 Comments

bitweever said:

Wouldn't this just be like Slashdot?

candace said:

but if blogs become journalism (and it's more likely they'll become talk radio instead), what's in it for me?

Yeah, Slashdot is a good model, and the Slash code is largely what I was thinking of when I mentioned adapting existing software. Also, it seems to work pretty well for Slashdot.

One problem with /. is that it's almost all flames these days, because of the moderation system. The thrust of my idea is combining a forum-based system with real editorial moderation.

It seemed like a good idea last night :)

Given the low volume of comments most blogs get, I don't think it's necessary for most blogs to switch to anything more advanced than what you've got now. Having a big, elaborate moderation and forum system would be severe overkill.

If that happens to MoN, sure, but until then, I'd leave it the way it is. (Except for listing more of the posts on the "Recent Comments" page :))

Also, I wanted to add that /. is not mostly flames *because* of the moderation system. (It's also not *mostly* flames to begin with, but there are a lot of them.) The number of flames stems directly from the increase in population. (Think about what happened to Usenet after AOL joined the Internet. Same phenomenon.) /.'s moderation is what allows the discussions to be useful *despite* the flames.

BruceR said:

Lumthemad.net had a great little bit of custom PHP that auto-started a new board thread for each front page article. If I could replicate that easily, I'd probably use it on my blogs. It was just about the ideal (better than slashdot, in that there was easier transitions between the threads via the "view all threads" page, so if you'd already read the articles that week, you could just skip to see which discussions were hot.)

Leave a comment

The comment login system is acting strange. If you get an error message saying you aren't logged in when you are, just reload the comment page and try again. I'm trying to track this bug down, but it's not easy.

Supporters

Email plasticATgmailDOTcom for text link and key word rates.